Labor and Employment Law
Ca. Labor & Emp't Rev. September 2017, Volume 31, No. 5
Content
- Labor & Employment Law Section Executive Committee 2016-2017
- Cases Pending Before the California Supreme Court
- Employment Law Case Notes
- Inside the Law Review
- Masthead
- Message from the Chair
- Nlra Case Notes
- Public Sector Case Notes
- Wage and Hour Case Notes
- Williams v. Superior Court: Employees' Perspective
- Williams v. Superior Court: Employer's Perspective
- MCLE Self-Study: the Sound of Silence: Class Action Issues in Arbitration
MCLE Self-Study: The Sound of Silence: Class Action Issues in Arbitration
By Hon. John M. True (Ret.)
Judge True retired from the Alameda County Superior Court bench in 2015 and currently provides mediation, arbitration, and other services as a neutral through ADR Services, Inc.
I. INTRODUCTION
The question whether an employer can draft an arbitration agreement containing a class-action waiver requiring its employees to arbitrate a dispute on a one-on-one basis only, and not as a group, is presently before the U.S. Supreme Court.1 Guidance on the issue will come soon, and, should the Court give its imprimatur to the practice, the employer community may begin utilizing language prohibiting class arbitrations with some regularity. Such a development will, in turn, cause the metaphysical tectonic plates underlying employment law to shift appreciably. In the meantimeâand perhaps thereafterâthere is the "silence" challenge: discerning whether an agreement that says nothing about class actions should be interpreted to prohibit them or permit them.