Intellectual Property Law
New Matter SPRING 2020, Volume 45, Number 1
Content
- Broad Institute Crispr: Epo Patent Revocation Lessons for Claiming Priority to Provisional Applications
- Federal Circuit Report
- McLe Self-Study Article: Bubble, Bubble, Oil-no Trouble?
- AmGen: Markush Practice in 2020
- Ttab Decisions and Developments
- Letter from the Chair
- McLe Self-Study Article: Ethics of Social Media For Lawyers: Where Stunting For the Gram Meets Losing Your Bar Card
- The Licensing Corner
- Upcoming Events
- Copyright News
- Intellectual Property Section Executive Committee 2019-2020
- Case Comments
- 2020 New Matter Author Submission Guidelines
- Letter from the Editor-in-Chief
- Quarterly International Ip Law Update
- Intellectual Property Section Interest Group Representatives 2019-2020
- Contents
- Ip and Art: An International Perspective
- Ninth Circuit Report
- The California Lawyers Association Intellectual Property Alumni
- Online Cle For Participatory Credit
Ninth Circuit Report
Anne-Marie Dao
Troutman Sanders LLP
Happy Spring! As an update to the last issue of the Ninth Circuit Report (in which the Supreme Court is considering the issue of whether, under Section 35 of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a), willful infringement is a prerequisite for an award of an infringer’s profits for a violation of Section 43(a), 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)), respondents and petitioner have filed their final briefs, and the case was argued on January 14, 2020. We’ll update once the Supreme Court weighs in on the case.
This Ninth Circuit Report will discuss a case you’ve all likely heard about-the Google. v. Oracle case.