Intellectual Property Law

New Matter WINTER 2020, Volume 45, Number 4

TTAB Decisions and Developments

Jane Shay Wald

Irell & Manella LLP

When Discovery’s Served And You Say You’ll Reply But Instead Serve A Motion For Summary J You Won’t Get Away With Sandbagging, Wise Guy As The Board Will Have Something Unpleasant To Say

The Board granted Respondent’s motion for discovery under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure56(d), finding that Petitioner’s timing of its Motion for Summary Judgment was an abuse of the discovery process. The rule provides that "if a party served with a motion for summary judgment shows by affidavit or declaration that, for specified reasons, it cannot present facts essential to justify its opposition, the court may (1) defer considering the motion or deny it; (2) allow time to obtain affidavits or declarations or to take discovery; or (3) issue any other appropriate order." Respondent maintained that, to respond to Petitioner’s motion for summary judgment, it required discovery as to Petitioner’s priority and certain facts going to likelihood of confusion.

Join CLA to access this page

Join Now

Forgot Password

Enter the email associated with you account. You will then receive a link in your inbox to reset your password.

Personal Information

Select Section(s)

CLA Membership is $99 and includes one section. Additional sections are $99 each.