Intellectual Property Law
New Matter SUMMER 2020, Volume 45, Number 2
Content
- 2020 New Matter Author Submission Guidelines
- Case Comments
- Cla Staff
- Contents
- Copyright News
- Finding Another On-Ramp to 101
- Intellectual Property Section Executive Committee 2019-2020
- Intellectual Property Section Interest Group Representatives 2019-2020
- Ip and Art: An International Perspective
- Letter from the Chair
- Letter from the Editor-in-Chief
- MCLE Self-Study Article
- Ninth Circuit Report
- Online Cle For Participatory Credit
- Patent Claims "Consisting Essentially of"
- Quarterly International Ip Law Update
- The California Lawyers Association Intellectual Property Alumni
- The Licensing Corner
- Ttab Decisions and Developments
TTAB Decisions and Developments
Jane Shay Wald
Irell & Manella LLP
Opposer Proved Standing By Use Of A Trade Name That Was Made By Its Sub, Wholly Owned The Applicant’s Branding Derived From The Same Name For Goods You Could Call "Telephoned"
This Opinion arose from a stipulated bifurcated proceeding to establish only the contested issue of whether Opposer had standing to oppose two application of Dormitus Brands LLC ("Dormitus"). Dormitus applied to register the standard character mark CINGULAR for a wide variety of telephonic goods, software and accessories in Class 9 as well as the CINGULAR mark and logo below, also for an array of such goods, in Class 9. AT&T Mobility LLC ("AT&T") opposed. The Board found that Opposer had proven standing based on trade name use by its wholly owned subsidiary.