Intellectual Property Law
New Matter SUMMER 2014, Volume 39, Number 2
Content
- 2014 New Matter Author Submission Guidelines
- Contents
- Copyright Interest Group
- Entertainment and Sports Law Interest Group
- Exploitation by Wrap Contracts—Click "Agree"
- How to Obtain Ip insurance or How to Watch Your Client's Back
- In-house Counsel Interest Group
- Intellectual Property Section Executive Committee 2013-2014
- Intellectual Property Section Interest Group Representatives 2013-2014
- International Interest Group
- International Ip Developments
- Letter from the Chair
- Letter from the Editor-in-Chief
- Licensing Interest Group
- Litigation Interest Group
- MCLE Self-Study Article
- Ninth Circuit Report
- Patent Interest Group
- Patents—Claim Construction—De Novo Standard of Review Upheld
- Technology, Internet, & Privacy Interest Group
- The Law of the Land
- The Licensing Corner
- Trademark Interest Group
- Case Comments
Case Comments
Lowell Anderson
Stetina Brunda Garred & Brucker
COPYRIGHTS – ACCESS
That two persons worked for the same company was not enough to show one had access to a copyrighted work disclosed to the other and failed to show a chain of events by which writers had access to a copyrighted song. Selling 46 copies of a song did not establish a widespread dissemination from which access may be inferred. Summary judgment dismissal of infringement claims was granted. Loomis v. Cornish, 109 U.S.P.Q.2d 1484 (N.D. Cal. 2014).