Intellectual Property Law
New Matter 2017, Volume 42, Number 3
Content
- 2017 New Matter Author Submission Guidelines
- Case Comments
- Case Note: Tc Heartland v. Kraft Foods
- Contents
- Dc Trip Report
- Federal Circuit Report
- Intellectual Property Section Executive Committee 2016-2017
- Intellectual Property Section Interest Group Representatives 2016-2017
- Letter from the Chair
- Letter from the Editor-in-Chief
- MCLE Self-Study Article
- Ninth Circuit Report
- Online Cle For Participatory Credit
- Quarterly International Ip Law Update
- Supreme Court Ip Decisions
- The Licensing Corner
- The State Bar of California Intellectual Property Alumni
- Ttab Decisions and Developments
- Ip and Art: An International Perspective
IP and Art: An International Perspective
Cristina Manasse
Manasse Studio Legale, Milan
HOW JIMI HENDRIX BECAME ORIGINAL—AND SOME ITALIAN LEGAL CURIOSITIES
My column of last spring edition on EU law and IP rights discussed the decision of a French court about a famous photograph of Jimi Hendrix by the also-famous photographer, Gered Mankowitz. The French court1 denied IP protection because the originality necessary for such protection had not been proven.