Family Law
Family Law News Issue 1, 2019, Volume 41, No. 1
Content
- Hipaa for the Family Formation Attorney
- Hipaa for the Family Formation Attorney
- Legislative Liaisons and Designated Recipients of Legislation
- Disqualification of Judges Under Code of Civil Procedure Section 170.4(c)(1)
- Message from the Chair: the Return of the Standing Committee
- Message from the Editor
- Is it Time For Gillmore to Go?
- My Client Died During the Dissolution Action, What Do I Do Now?
- Two Views on the Use of Psychological Testing in Child Custody Evaluations
- My Client Died During the Dissolution Action, What Do I Do Now?
- Afcc-ca Mentorship Project
- Legislative Liaisons and Designated Recipients of Legislation
- Family Law Section Executive Committee
- Technology Corner: the Mobile Warrior's Briefcase, Part 1 (organization)
- Family Law News Editorial Team
- Table of Contents
- Is it Time For Gillmore to Go?
- Technology Corner: the Mobile Warrior's Briefcase, Part 1 (organization)
- Family Law News Editorial Team
- Two Views on the Use of Psychological Testing in Child Custody Evaluations
- Message from the Editor
- Table of Contents
- Message from the Chair: the Return of the Standing Committee
- Disqualification of Judges Under Code of Civil Procedure Section 170.4(c)(1)
- Afcc-ca Mentorship Project
- Family Law Section Executive Committee
Message from the Chair: The Return of the Standing Committee
Stephen D. Hamilton
An important function of the Family Law Executive Committee (FLEXCOM) is to be a representative voice of the 4,000+ members of the Family Law Section. We currently rely on liaisons from different geographic or practice areas to carry out that function. That was not always the case. A brief history lesson will explain why we have liaisons presently.
Standing Committees
Historically, FLEXCOM received input from our section members through the formation and participation of Standing Committees. A standing committee was typically a locally formed group of family law attorneys who would meet and discuss issues relevant to family law. This included, but was not limited to, legislation. Each standing committee had its chair or designated representative then come to FLEXCOM’s meetings to inform us as to what the local family law practitioners thought and to broaden our perspective beyond that of the 17 voting members of FLEXCOM. It was a model that worked well and led to excellent communication and participation by family law attorneys at a regional level.