Family Law
Family Law News Issue 1, 2014, Volume 36, No. 1
Content
- Case and Legislation Highlights: the Year in Review
- Continuing the Conversation...
- Davis, Fonstein, Epstein & Irc §1041—a History of "Immediate and Specific"
- Family Law Section Executive Committee
- In this Issue:
- Individual Retirement Accounts—Where Do Ira's Fit in the Judgment Protocol under Family Code §2337?
- Masthead
- Message from the Chair
- Message from the Editor
- Sb 274: the Law and Multi-Parent Families
- Standing Chairs and Designated Recipients of Legislation
- Understanding Van Camp and Pereira: Apportionment of Separate versus Community Property
- Question Posed to Authors Bill Eddy and Judge Román Regarding Budget Issues in our Family Courts
Question Posed to Authors Bill Eddy and Judge Román Regarding Budget Issues in our Family Courts
Question from the Editor: With the budget issues in Family Court and issues raised by Mr. Bill Eddy (article published in the FLN Issue 4, 2013, that you commented on), is there anything you believe individual practitioners, law firms and corporations can do to contribute and aid in the efforts needed to help us out of the crisis discussed by many, as the budget seems to be at its core?
The Honorable Judge Román’s response:
I start with the fact that 74% of the population appearing in family court is unrepresented. By the time of judgment and beyond, that number is 80%.
The bar is severely underrepresented as it intersects with the administration of justice in family court. Indeed, mental health practitioners are more common because every case involving custody or visitation will involve interaction with a mental health practitioner.