Business Law
Business Law Annual Review 2016
Content
- 2015 Commercial Law Developments
- 2015 Developments in Cyberspace Law
- Annual Update of Alternative Dispute Resolution Cases
- Bln Editorial Board: Message from the Editor
- Bls Opinions Committee: Review of Projects for 2016
- Business Law News Editorial Team
- California Agribusiness Laws Enacted in 2015
- Executive Committee: Message from the Chair
- Executive Committee of the Business Law Section 2015-2016
- Health Care Law Legislation and Litigation Update for 2015: California Health Law Continues to Evolve at a Rapid Pace
- Legislative Update - Consumer Financial Services
- Recent Developments Affecting Insolvency and Commercial Finance in California and the Ninth Circuit
- Recent Developments in Partnership and Llc Law
- Standing Committee Officers of the Business Law Section 2015-2016
- Table of Contents
- Business Litigation: Year in Review
Business Litigation: Year in Review
Dean Kirby
Dean Kirby is a member of firm of Kirby & McGuinn, A P.C., a seven-lawyer boutique firm with offices in San Diego. He represents lenders, creditors and fiduciaries, in bankruptcy, foreclosure and commercial collection matters.
The Business Litigation Committee is the newest committee of the Business Law Section. In addition to its work in presenting continuing legal education programs, monitoring and, if appropriate, taking positions on pending legislation, or making its own legislative proposals, the Committee regularly sends email advising of current developments. Updates in 2015 concerned both litigation practice and changes in substantive law that affect business litigation. To be included in our constituency list to receive these updates, please contact Ellen Fenichel at efenichel@vallemakoff.com, or Lisa Jacobs at ljacobs@sflaw.com.
Privilege. We reported on two important decisions in the area of attorney client privilege. In Anten v. Superior Court, 233 Cal. App. 4th 1254 (2d Dist. 2015), the court held that when joint clients do not sue each other but one of them sues their former attorney, the non-suing client cannot prevent the parties to the lawsuit from discovering or introducing otherwise privileged attorney-client communications made in the course ofthe joint representation. The court emphasized that while communications between one joint client and the attorney are privileged as to third parties, they are not privileged as to the other joint client. It is often not clear to jointly represented clients that their communications with their lawyer cannot be kept secret from the other client(s). That issue should be dealt with in retainer agreements or otherwise at the outset of the engagement to avoid problems down the line.