Antitrust and Unfair Competition Law
Competition: Fall 2020, Vol 30, No. 2
- Ai and Interdependent Pricing: Combination Without Conspiracy?
- Big Data and Antitrust Risks In Close-up: From the Perspective of Real Cases
- Blockchain Technology: a Future Antitrust Target?
- Digital Platform Competition, Merger Control, and the Incentive To Innovate: Don't Kill the Goose That Lays the Golden Egg
- Editor's Note
- Fourth Annual "Celebrating Women In Competition Law In California"
- It's High Tide Again In Internet Markets
- Privacy, Pricing, and the Value of Consumer Data: the Complex Nature of the Ccpa's Non-discrimination Requirement
- The Ftaia's "Domestic Effects" Exception: Why the Ninth Circuit Got It Right
- The Simple Economics of Hybrid Marketplaces
- Chair's Column
Elizabeth C. Pritzker
Pritzker Levine LLP
I start this column with what likely will be the most common sentence of 2020. The year brought many challenges and quite a few obstacles.
For public safety reasons and to try to stem the spread of COVID-19, we all "practiced" social distancing and became quite experienced in itâlearning first-hand what it means to both work and live at home. We relied on Zoom as our meeting space: we tested its limits and, more than once, it tested ours. Cries for social and racial justice bring to light, once again, systematic inequality in public health and the criminal justice system. We grieved (and sometimes watched) the brutal shootings and unfortunate deaths of Ahmaud Arbery, Breonna Taylor, George Floyd, and too many others.
I am proud to have had the privilege of chairing the Executive Committee of the Antitrust, Unfair Competition and Privacy Section during this time. Throughout the year, our outstanding volunteers put together terrific virtual programs and networking events, continued with the publication of timely pieces in our monthly newsletter, e-Briefs, and authored, edited, or contributed to the California Antitrust and Unfair Competition Law treatise, as well as this edition of Competition.