Antitrust and Unfair Competition Law
Competition: Spring 2019, Vol 29, No. 1
Content
- A Practitioner's Perspective: Why the Supreme Court Should Not Overturn Illinois Brick In Apple V. Pepper
- The Interplay of the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation and U.S. E-Discovery—One Year Later, the View Remains the Same
- The Interplay of the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation and U.S. E-Discovery—One Year Later, the View Remains the Same
- In re: Processed Egg Products Antitrust Litigation: a Panel Discussion With Trial Counsel
- California Antitrust and Unfair Competition Law Update: Substantive Law
- California and Federal Antitrust Law Update: Procedural Developments
- In re: Processed Egg Products Antitrust Litigation: a Panel Discussion With Trial Counsel
- Antitrust, Ucl and Privacy Section Executive Committee 2018-2019
- Golden State Institute's 28Th Anniversary Edition
- Editor's Note
- California and Federal Antitrust Law Update: Procedural Developments
- Antitrust Enforcement Panel: a Conversation With Two Enforcers
- In re: Solodyn Antitrust Litigation: Lessons From a "Big Stakes" Reverse Payment Pharmaceutical Trial
- Managing Class Actions and Complex Litigation—a View From the Bench
- Social Media, Right To Privacy and the California Consumer Privacy Act
- Editor's Note
- Golden State Institute's 28Th Anniversary Edition
- Chair's Column
- Social Media, Right To Privacy and the California Consumer Privacy Act
- Chair's Column
- Antitrust Enforcement Panel: a Conversation With Two Enforcers
- Where Do We Go From Here: Article III Standing and Cy Pres-only Settlements In Privacy Class Actions In the Wake of Frank V. Gaos
- Antitrust, Ucl and Privacy Section Executive Committee 2018-2019
- California Antitrust and Unfair Competition Law Update: Substantive Law
- Managing Class Actions and Complex Litigation—a View From the Bench
- In re: Solodyn Antitrust Litigation: Lessons From a "Big Stakes" Reverse Payment Pharmaceutical Trial
- Where Do We Go From Here: Article III Standing and Cy Pres-only Settlements In Privacy Class Actions In the Wake of Frank V. Gaos
CHAIR’S COLUMN
Lee F. Berger1
U.S. Department of Justice
Washington, DC
With thanks to the authors, editors and other contributors, our Section is pleased to present you with another edition of Competition. This issue covers a variety of articles on important antitrust, unfair competition and privacy law topics, including discussions from our flagship program, the Golden State Institute (GSI), an annual day-long conference that takes place each fall. This year’s GSI will be held on Thursday, November 14, 2019, at the historic Julia Morgan Ballroom in San Francisco, California.
The Antitrust, UCL and Privacy Section now enters our second year under the newly-formed California Lawyers Association. Membership remains steady, our Section and the CLA remain in the black, attendance at our annual Golden State Institute is up, and membership engagement remains strong. We are on solid footing to continue our growth.
With separation from the State Bar of California has come structural changes to our Section. The Section now has a committee system to handle some of our most important activities: the Privacy Committee coordinates all programming and publications regarding privacy matters; the Publications Committee produces and edits Competition and our monthly electronic newsletter, e-Briefs; the Education Committee organizes our webinars and live events; and the Treatise Committee edits and publishes California State Antitrust and Unfair Competition Law, Revised Edition. These committees have created additional leadership opportunities, enabling more Section members to get actively involved in the educational work of our Section.