Intellectual Property Law
New Matter FALL 2023, VOLUME 48, EDITION 3
Content
- 2023 Dc Delegation Trip Report
- 2023 New Matter Author Submission Guidelines
- ANDY WARHOL FOUNDATION FOR THE VISUAL ARTS V. GOLDSMITH: Expanding the Degree of SimilarityâTrimming Transformative Use
- DARRABY GLIB NOTES⢠Andy Warhol Foundation Supreme Court Opinion: Highlights And Sound Bites
- Federal Circuit Report
- INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECTION Executive Committee 2022-2023
- INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECTION Interest Group Representatives 2022-2023
- Intellectual Property Section New Matter Editorial Board
- IS ALL FAIR IN POP ART AND CELEBRITY PHOTOGRAPHY (PART II)? In Which the Justices Turn to Economics to Level the Playing Field for Human Creatives
- Letter From the Chair
- Letter From the Editor-in-chief
- Mickey Mouse and the Public Domain
- Mitigating Ai Bias With Responsible Ai Design
- Online Cle For Participatory Credit
- Patentability of Artificial Intelligence On the Precipice of Reform
- Quarterly International Ip Law Update
- Recent Disqualification Precedent Raises Interesting Questions About Computer Access and Data Rights
- Six Things To Know About the California Privacy Rights Act
- Table of Contents
- The California Lawyers Association Intellectual Property Alumni
- The Licensing Corner
- Trade Secret Report
- Ttab Decisions and Developments
- Ninth Circuit Report
NINTH CIRCUIT REPORT
Anne-Marie Dao
Sheppard Mullin
This issue discusses the Supreme Court’s decision in the final saga to our dog chew toys shaped like alcohol cases! I covered this case in past issues of the Ninth Circuit Report. Originally, the Supreme Court denied certiorari, but further rulings prompted the Supreme Court to grant certiorari to answer the question of under which circumstances the humorous use of another’s mark as one’s own mark on a commercial product constitutes trademark infringement or dilution. On June 8, 2023, the Supreme Court issued its opinion.