This program offers 1 participatory MCLE credit; 1 Legal Specialization in Workers’ Compensation Law.

In this one hour program, the speakers will use examples from recent case law to explain the distinction between medical evidence of apportionment versus vocational evidence of apportionment. Tips will be provided on what constitutes substantial medical evidence with regard to bullet proof apportionment.

Case Law Analysis:
Acme Steel v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (Borman)(2013) 218 Cal.App.4th 1137, 78 Cal.Comp.Cases 751
Hennessey v. Compass Group and National Fire Ins. Company of Pittsburgh 
(2019) 84 Cal.Comp.Cases 756, (WCAB panel decision) 
Pattiz v. SCIF/MTC Trucking, Inc.2015 Cal.Wrk.Comp. P.D. LEXIS 541, 43 CWCR 201
Singh v. State of California 2017 Cal.Wrk.Comp. P.D. LEXIS 204 (WCAB panel decision)
Johnson v. State of California Department of Corrections2020 Cal.Wrk.Comp. P.D. LEXIS 57 (WCAB panel decision).
Colvin v. Inner Circle Investments, Inc. 2020 Cal.Wrk.Comp. P.D. LEXIS 136 (WCAB panel decision).
Wright v. First American Title Company2019 Cal.Wrk.Comp. P.D. LEXIS 584 (WCAB panel decision)

Speaker: Eric Ledger

Moderator: Raymond Correio

---

Related webinar: Expert Tips on Apportionment Part I

Save 20% when you purchase both webinars at once! Offer ends 8/13/2021.